Accessibility settings

Published on in Vol 9 (2026)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/89731, first published .
Assessing Caregiver Comfort With Linking the Health Care System and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)

Assessing Caregiver Comfort With Linking the Health Care System and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)

Assessing Caregiver Comfort With Linking the Health Care System and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)

1Office of Student Affairs, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States

2Department of Epidemiology & Prevention, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States

3Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC, United States

Corresponding Author:

Kimberly Montez, MD, MPH




The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) is an evidence-based federal nutrition program that provides nutrition education, breastfeeding support, health care referrals, and access to healthy foods for low-income families [1]. Studies demonstrate that WIC participation is associated with improved birth outcomes, reduced infant mortality, and better overall child nutrition [2]. Given the benefits of WIC and underenrollment among eligible children, there is increasing interest in strengthening partnerships between health care settings and WIC to facilitate family enrollment and engagement [3].

Although health care systems and WIC care for a shared population, they exist in information silos, utilizing different electronic systems. While states allow sharing of specific data between health care settings and WIC, a form must be completed and faxed, creating barriers. Integrating WIC referrals within clinical care may improve WIC uptake, data sharing, and nutrition/health outcomes, but little research has explored family perspectives about information exchange between health care providers and WIC regarding their child’s health [4]. Better understanding family perceptions of information exchange could facilitate improvements in the design of effective, family-centered referral pathways. This study aims to assess families’ comfort levels with information-sharing between health care providers and WIC using a survey-based approach.


Study Design and Intervention

This cross-sectional study was part of a mixed methods study that implemented an innovative electronic health record (EHR)–based WIC screening and referral tool [5,6]. Briefly, WIC staff in three counties were granted secure, online, read-only access to the health system’s EHR [7], allowing review of medical charts, sending and receiving secure messages with health care teams, and receiving WIC referrals. This intervention was permissible under a memorandum of understanding that allowed data sharing between the health care system and county health departments. Participants gave verbal permission to have their information shared with WIC, which was documented in the EHR.

Data Collection and Analysis

To understand parent/caregiver perceptions of information-sharing, a telephone-based survey was developed based on a review of the literature [8]. The survey was pilot-tested for face validity with resulting minor changes in sentence structure or word choice. The survey had four sections: (1) WIC participation history, (2) WIC benefit usage, (3) communication between health care team and WIC, and (4) self-reported demographics, including race/ethnicity (Hispanic vs non-Hispanic and Asian, Black, White, or Other [specify]) and food insecurity status using the Hunger Vital Sign [9]. Race/ethnicity were included as variables since WIC participation rates vary by race/ethnicity. Caregivers were eligible to participate if their child was ≤5 years old and attended one of eight participating clinics, received WIC benefits within the past year, underwent WIC EHR screening, and spoke English/Spanish. Eligible participants were purposively sampled via weekly EHR extractions of WIC screening results and were recruited via telephone, consented, and verbally administered the survey by trained research staff (AP, BO-S) in the participant’s preferred language. The staff member conducting the survey in Spanish was certified bilingual. Recruitment occurred from March to July 2022. Results were entered into Research Electronic Data Capture. Participants received a US $25 gift card as renumeration.

Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Bivariate comparisons between participant groups based upon demographic and other characteristics were made using χ2 testing or t testing (SAS, version 9.4; SAS Institute).

Ethical Considerations

The Wake Forest University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board approved this study (IRB00078127).


Of 100 survey respondents, 93% were mothers. Respondents had a mean age of 29.9 years; 33% were Black, 19% White, and 53% Hispanic; 53% had completed high school (Table 1).

Table 1. Participant demographics (N=100).
Participant demographicsValues
Caregiver relationship, n (%)
 Mother93 (93)
 Father4 (4)
 Nonrelated caregiver3 (3)
Caregiver age, mean (SD)29.9 (6.1)
Caregiver race, n (%)
 White19 (19)
 Black33 (33)
 Other48 (48)
Caregiver ethnicity, n (%)
 Hispanic53 (53)
 Non-Hispanic45 (45)
 Missing2 (2)
Child age, mean (SD)3.5 (0.98)

aOther race/ethnicity included: Costa Rican, Hispanic, Mexican, Mayan, multiracial, Puerto Rican, and Salvadorian. These answers were provided via an open-ended text box after “Other” was chosen.

One third (35%) reported food insecurity (FI); 90% reported receiving WIC benefits for ≥1 year (see Multimedia Appendix 1 for full survey results). Overall, 79% were comfortable and 17% were uncomfortable about their child’s doctor communicating directly with WIC. Ninety-one percent were very or somewhat comfortable with WIC accessing their child’s EHR and 6% were uncomfortable; 95% were very or somewhat comfortable with secure messaging between their child’s doctor and WIC. Caregiver race/ethnicity and age were not associated with reported comfort levels (Table 2).

Table 2. Bivariate comparison between demographics and comfort levels with different activities involving the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children’s (WIC’s) access to electronic health record (EHR) data.
DemographicComfortable with doctor communication with WICaP valueComfortable with WIC staff having access to child’s EHRaP valueComfortable with doctors and WIC using the EHR to send secure messagesaP value
Caregiver race, %
  White79.0.84b89.5.96b89.5.21b
  Black78.890.9100
  Other83.391.793.8
Caregiver ethnicity, %
Hispanic
(n=53)
84.9.52b92.5.81b94.3.39b
Non-Hispanic (n=45)80.091.197.8
Comparing mean (SD) age (years) across comfortable versus uncomfortable caregivers
Comfortablea caregivers29.7 (6.3).57c30.0 (6.1).60c29.9 (6.2).79c
Uncomfortable caregivers30.6 (5.3)28.9 (6.6)30.6 (4.0)

aFor the “Doctor Communication” question, “comfortable” designation combines individuals with “comfortable” and “neither comfortable nor uncomfortable” survey responses, and for the EHR questions, the “comfortable” designation combines individuals with “very comfortable” and “somewhat comfortable” survey responses in Multimedia Appendix 1.

bFor comparing rates of “comfortable” responses across categorical groups (eg, race, ethnicity), P values are for χ2 tests.

cTo compare the mean ages of caregivers who were comfortable versus not for each task, t tests were used.


While pediatricians, WIC nutritionists, and caregivers alike have identified data security and confidentiality as potential barriers to implementing integrated care models [4], WIC participants in this study were overwhelmingly comfortable with information sharing and integrated communication between health care providers and WIC. These comfort levels did not significantly vary by caregiver age, race, or ethnicity, signifying broad acceptability across demographic groups. Over one-third of caregivers reported FI, and almost all received WIC benefits for a year or longer.

These findings highlight an opportunity—caregivers were largely open to enhanced communication between health care systems and WIC. A prior study showed the majority of health care providers and WIC staff in favor of an EHR-based referral intervention [5]. Given the high prevalence of FI and the favorable attitudes toward EHR-based information sharing, health care systems may be uniquely positioned to bridge service gaps through continued thoughtful collaboration with community-based nutrition programs like WIC. Increasing the uptake of WIC and enhancing communication between the two systems have public health relevance, such as strengthening prevention/early intervention efforts on FI and obesity and reducing inconsistent messaging [10].

Although the American Academy of Pediatrics and the National WIC Association recommend health care referrals to WIC [11,12], practical and policy barriers prevent uptake of this recommendation. Chief among these policy barriers is that, without specialized legal data sharing agreements, bidirectional data sharing between health care systems and WIC is prevented by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act [13]. Modifying such policies to allow for easier bidirectional data sharing could support direct referrals to/from health care practitioners and WIC, improve care coordination, and increase communication between the two entities, which often share populations but are siloed. To support such policies, more research is needed to determine whether WIC accessing the EHR improves efficiency of care and decreases costs and care duplication.

This study had several limitations. While modest, the sample size was limited by funding. Results are from one institution, which may limit generalizability of findings. Social desirability and selection biases may have influenced participant responses; all surveyed caregivers had consented to information sharing/referral, which may have prejudiced their comfort levels with bidirectional communication. Future studies should explore the impact of such information sharing on FI outcomes, parent/caregiver trust, and health care utilization and outcomes over time.

Funding

This project was supported by a grant from Healthy Eating Research, a national program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. This project was also supported by the Wake Forest University School of Medicine Clinical and Translational Science Institute, funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health, through Grant Award Number UM1TR004929. The funding organizations had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Data Availability

Deidentified individual participant data (including data dictionaries) will be made available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author. Data are available on request due to privacy/ethical restrictions.

Authors' Contributions

KAS drafted the initial manuscript and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content.

BO-S and AP collected data and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content.

KHL conceptualized and designed the study, designed data collection instruments, carried out the initial analysis, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content.

KM conceptualized and designed the study, designed data collection instruments, drafted portions of the initial manuscript, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content.

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

Multimedia Appendix 1

Survey responses.

DOCX File, 18 KB

  1. WIC benefits and services. USDA food and nutrition service. 2025. URL: https://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/benefits-services [Accessed 2025-06-24]
  2. Venkataramani M, Ogunwole SM, Caulfield LE, et al. Maternal, infant, and child health outcomes associated with the special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. Oct 2022;175(10):1411-1422. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  3. Davis RA, Leavitt HB, Chau M. A review of interventions to increase WIC enrollment and participation. J Community Health. Dec 2022;47(6):990-1000. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  4. Bailey-Davis L, Kling SMR, Cochran WJ, et al. Integrating and coordinating care between the Women, Infants, and Children Program and pediatricians to improve patient-centered preventive care for healthy growth. Transl Behav Med. Nov 21, 2018;8(6):944-952. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  5. McCall A, Strahley AE, Martin-Fernandez KW, et al. WIC staff and healthcare professional perceptions of an EHR intervention to facilitate referrals to and improve communication and coordination with WIC: A qualitative study. J Clin Transl Sci. 2024;8(1):e47. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  6. Monroe BS, Rengifo LM, Wingler MR, et al. Assessing and improving WIC enrollment in the primary care setting: a quality initiative. Pediatrics. Aug 1, 2023;152(2):e2022057613. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  7. Epic CommunityLink. Epic. 2023. URL: https://link.epic.com [Accessed 2024-01-16]
  8. National survey of WIC participants. United States Department of Agriculture; 2001. URL: https://fns-prod.azureedge.us/sites/default/files/WICSurvey.pdf [Accessed 2026-05-01]
  9. Hager ER, Quigg AM, Black MM, et al. Development and validity of a 2-item screen to identify families at risk for food insecurity. Pediatrics. Jul 2010;126(1):e26-e32. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  10. Ali S, Gibbs SE, Wiseman K, et al. A qualitative study to understand parental, health care provider and WIC nutritionist perspectives on early childhood beverage choices for WIC-enrolled families in a Southeastern US health system. Matern Child Health J. May 2025;29(5):628-638. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  11. Ashbrook A, Essel K, Montez K, Bennett-Tejes D. Screen and intervene: a toolkit for pediatricians to address food insecurity. Food Research & Action Center; 2021. URL: https://frac.org/wp-content/uploads/FRAC_AAP_Toolkit_2021_032122.pdf [Accessed 2025-10-25]
  12. Health care providers outreach toolkit. National WIC Association; 2024. URL: https:/​/media.​nwica.org/​hcp%20toolkit%20-%20with%20how%20to%20establish%20referral%20and%20data%20sharing%20process.​pdf [Accessed 2026-05-01]
  13. Summary of the HIPAA privacy rule. United States Department of Health and Human Services. 2025. URL: https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/laws-regulations/index.html [Accessed 2026-03-23]


EHR: electronic health record
FI: food insecurity
WIC: Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children


Edited by Matthew Balcarras; submitted 16.Dec.2025; peer-reviewed by Joanna Perdomo, Yining Ma; final revised version received 21.Apr.2026; accepted 21.Apr.2026; published 06.May.2026.

Copyright

© K Alexander Soltany, Kristina H Lewis, Beatriz Ospino-Sanchez, Angelina Pack, Kimberly Montez. Originally published in JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting (https://pediatrics.jmir.org), 6.May.2026.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://pediatrics.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.